Posts of Praying Medic News

newest first

#11136Link preview
Views6,894−7%vs avg
Forwards80
Reactions248
Comments—
Views growthHide views growth

Views growth

Hours after publication

Show as table
Hours after publicationViews
0 h1,246
11 h6,894
  1. After 1 hour1,246
  2. Total to date6,894
#11135Link preview

John Reese Looks like my reporting is correct: Yes, according to multiple reports from the New York Times, CBS News, and others published on or around November 3, 2026. The DOJ sent letters to roughly 20 Democrats notifying them that they might be targets (or issued a mix of target letters, preservation letters, and related notices). Marc Elias (whose firm has represented Peltola and other Democrats) is among those identified as a target. At least one DSCC official was also named as an intended recipient, and the DSCC itself received a grand jury subpoena.⁠ CBS News: The investigation is led by the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Alaska, with involvement from the Civil Rights Division’s criminal section. It follows earlier grand jury subpoenas and a public press conference by Alaska’s U.S. Attorney disclosing the probe.⁠ Fox News Timing has drawn attention: the letters went out in recent days, on or near Election Day in a close race. Democrats have called this highly unusual and accused the administration of weaponizing the DOJ; they describe “ballot stacking” (recruiting same-name or spoiler candidates) as a longstanding, if controversial, campaign tactic that is not clearly illegal under state law. Trump has publicly pressed for accountability and criticized Elias by name. ⁠Rawstory Elias has responded that he and his firm are targets of a “sham investigation” with “zero evidence of wrongdoing,” framing it as political retribution, and said they will not be intimidated. ⁠CBS News A related civil lawsuit by the DOJ seeking to limit certification under certain circumstances had stalled or been dismissed around the same time. Target letters indicate the prosecutor views the recipient as a putative defendant with substantial evidence linking them to a potential crime (per DOJ guidelines); they are not indictments or charges. The exact statutes under consideration have not been fully detailed publicly, though theories such as conspiracy to interfere with voting rights have been discussed. https://x.com/Rickisback_ON_X/status/2117724207568335079?a=5jm67wyFOHPqggH4d7A&s=20

Open in Telegram
Views7,279−2%vs avg
Forwards55
Reactions277
Comments—
Views growthHide views growth

Views growth

Hours after publication

Show as table
Hours after publicationViews
0 h0
4 h4,463
14 h7,279
  1. After 6 hours4,463
  2. Total to date7,279
#11134Photoalbum
Views10,970+48%vs avg
Forwards146
Reactions—
Comments—
Views growthHide views growth

Views growth

Hours after publication

Show as table
Hours after publicationViews
0 h0
4 h7,229
15 h10,970
  1. After 6 hours7,229
  2. Total to date10,970
#11133Photoalbum
Views11,014+49%vs avg
Forwards145
Reactions565
Comments—
Views growthHide views growth

Views growth

Hours after publication

Show as table
Hours after publicationViews
0 h0
4 h7,246
15 h11,014
  1. After 6 hours7,246
  2. Total to date11,014
#11132Text
Views4,856−34%vs avg
Forwards39
Reactions227
Comments—
Views growthHide views growth

Views growth

Hours after publication

Show as table
Hours after publicationViews
0 h576
9 h4,856
  1. After 1 hour576
  2. Total to date4,856
#11128Link preview
Views6,779−8%vs avg
Forwards50
Reactions276
Comments—
Views growthHide views growth

Views growth

Hours after publication

Show as table
Hours after publicationViews
0 h0
7 h4,460
26 h6,779
  1. After 6 hours4,460
  2. After 24 hours6,779
  3. Total to date6,779
#11127Link preview
Views5,792−22%vs avg
Forwards31
Reactions188
Comments—
Views growthHide views growth

Views growth

Hours after publication

Show as table
Hours after publicationViews
0 h0
3 h2,219
12 h4,521
30 h5,792
  1. After 24 hours5,792
  2. Total to date5,792
#11126Link preview
Views7,465+1%vs avg
Forwards114
Reactions319
Comments—
Views growthHide views growth

Views growth

Hours after publication

Show as table
Hours after publicationViews
0 h0
4 h3,715
13 h6,124
32 h7,465
  1. After 6 hours3,715
  2. After 24 hours7,465
  3. Total to date7,465
#11125Link previewedited
Views6,719−9%vs avg
Forwards49
Reactions240
Comments—
Views growthHide views growth

Views growth

Hours after publication

Show as table
Hours after publicationViews
0 h0
4 h3,359
13 h5,530
32 h6,719
  1. After 6 hours3,359
  2. After 24 hours6,719
  3. Total to date6,719
#11124Link preview

Coffe Report Norway Raises National Cyber Risk To High Norway is facing a deteriorating cybersecurity environment, with authorities reporting a sharp increase in successful cyber operations. On October 27, Norway's National Security Authority (NSM) publicly announced a HIGH national cyber risk level, the second-highest on its five-level scale. Key findings: • Successful cyber operations against Norwegian organisations have tripled over the past six months. • Defence, space and critical infrastructure sectors face particularly high risks. • Authorities warn that cyberattacks could disrupt electricity, water, mobile networks and internet services. • NSM and the Directorate for Civil Protection have urged the public to prepare for potential disruptions. Just three days later, on October 30, the Arctic University of Norway (UiT) disclosed a targeted cyberattack. Attackers successfully accessed several servers, forcing the university to take affected systems offline. University officials described the attacker as a well-resourced threat actor and confirmed that this was not a conventional DDoS attack. As of October 31, no theft of personal information had been identified. The attacker's identity and motives remain unknown, and no direct connection to the broader increase in cyber operations has been established. The developments highlight growing cybersecurity challenges facing Norway, including institutions operating in the strategically important Arctic region. https://x.com/CoffeReport/status/2117175887120466003?a=_MshvpMs7MwLIe5hiiw&s=20

Open in Telegram
Views6,915−7%vs avg
Forwards56
Reactions236
Comments—
Views growthHide views growth

Views growth

Hours after publication

Show as table
Hours after publicationViews
0 h0
5 h3,653
14 h5,724
32 h6,915
  1. After 6 hours3,653
  2. Total to date6,915
#11123Text
Views5,413−27%vs avg
Forwards1
Reactions178
Comments—
Views growthHide views growth

Views growth

Hours after publication

Show as table
Hours after publicationViews
0 h0
8 h3,709
26 h5,413
  1. After 6 hours3,709
  2. After 24 hours5,413
  3. Total to date5,413
#11122Link preview
Views7,993+8%vs avg
Forwards55
Reactions380
Comments—
Views growthHide views growth

Views growth

Hours after publication

Show as table
Hours after publicationViews
0 h0
6 h3,716
18 h5,818
30 h6,876
68 h7,993
  1. After 6 hours3,716
  2. After 24 hours6,876
  3. Total to date7,993
#11121Photo
Views7,203−3%vs avg
Forwards86
Reactions485
Comments—
Views growthHide views growth

Views growth

Hours after publication

Show as table
Hours after publicationViews
0 h0
5 h3,016
30 h6,037
72 h7,203
  1. After 6 hours3,016
  2. After 24 hours6,037
  3. Total to date7,203
#11119Link preview
Views7,869+6%vs avg
Forwards113
Reactions360
Comments—
Views growthHide views growth

Views growth

Hours after publication

Show as table
Hours after publicationViews
0 h0
7 h3,759
69 h7,869
  1. After 6 hours3,759
  2. Total to date7,869