NeuralZone | AI Apps

@NeuralZone – Curated, hand-picked AI tools and services that are actually useful. Buy ads: https://telega.io/c/NeuralZone contact us via @photofixer

Username
@neuralzone
Category
Technologies
Created
, 2 years
Subscribers381,350−154 in 1 day
Avg views per post, 7d1,447last 7 days
ERR0.38%last 7 days

Subscribers, 30 days

Oct 2 – Oct 3−154 (0%)

Show as table
DateSubscribers
Oct 2, 2026381,504
Oct 3, 2026381,350

Average views per post by day

By publication day

Show as table
DateAvg views per post
Sep 14, 202622,957
Sep 15, 202624,320
Oct 3, 20261,447

Most viewed this month

  1. 01
    Views24.3K
    Forwards8
    Reactions30
    Comments—
  2. 02
    Views23K
    Forwards6
    Reactions16
    Comments—
  3. 03
    Views1.45K
    Forwards2
    Reactions4
    Comments—

Latest posts

#421Photo

🔐 Send files without giving up your privacy CortexDrop encrypts your files right in the browser before upload, then stores them on decentralized IPFS. ✅ No account needed ✅ Free up to 1 GB ✅ Self-destructing links ✅ Password protection Drop a file, get a private link in seconds 👇 Try CortexDrop free

Open in Telegram
Views1,447−91%vs avg
Forwards2
Reactions4
Comments—
#420Video

🚀 GigaChat 3.5 Reasoning — a new open-source LLM that thinks before it answers. It breaks problems into stages, builds a plan, checks intermediate results, and self-corrects. Built on GigaChat 3.5 Ultra, it explores multiple step-by-step reasoning paths for math & coding, using automated verification to reinforce correct answers. ⚡️ Proprietary linear attention makes it highly efficient on long contexts, retaining key points without re-matching from scratch. It’s also token-efficient: uses 37% fewer tokens than DeepSeek V4 Flash Preview on math problems! 📈 Benchmark gains over non-reasoning version: • IFBench: 44 → 77 • Natural Plan: 64 → 80 • LiveCodeBench v6: 56 → 85 📦 MIT license. Weights on Hugging Face: fp8 | bf16

Open in Telegram
Views24,320+50%vs avg
Forwards8
Reactions30
Comments—
#419Photo

🚀 READY TO TRADE BEYOND THE LIMITS? 🌕 Welcome to MOON — where the markets never sleep. ⚡️ Up to 1000X Leverage 📈 Crypto, Stocks & More 🌍 24/7 Markets 🔥 Go LONG or SHORT The next market move could happen anytime. Are you ready? 🚀 START TRADING NOW 👇 https://tglink.io/c655378883fd8d

Open in Telegram
Views22,957+41%vs avg
Forwards6
Reactions16
Comments—
#414Photoalbum
Views74,751+360%vs avg
Forwards14
Reactions—
Comments—
#413Photoalbum
Views74,647+360%vs avg
Forwards14
Reactions—
Comments—
#412Photoalbum
Views57,939+257%vs avg
Forwards14
Reactions—
Comments—
#411Photoalbum
Views58,193+258%vs avg
Forwards14
Reactions—
Comments—
#410Photoalbum

🚀 Seedream 5.0 Pro — a new top-tier AI model for image generation and editing, now available for Premium users of @PhotoFixerBot! Seedream 5.0 Pro excels at generating photorealistic images and high-density infographics, significantly outperforming the previous Seedream 4.5 and 5.0 Lite models. In the rankings, Seedream 5.0 Pro matches Nano Banana 2 and Nano Banana Pro in generation quality, while offering much less restrictive censorship. 🤓 @PhotoFixerBot 📸 NeuralZone

Open in Telegram
Views55,792+244%vs avg
Forwards14
Reactions47
Comments—
#407Text

Forwarded from How AI Helps

Six AI coding agents took one visual IQ test, and Codex 5.5 won by method, speed, and cost One small test asked agents to solve 25 visual puzzles on iq-test.cc, select age 30, and return a result link. This was not a lab benchmark. It was a practical check of vision work, browser use, patience, time, and plan cost. "Take the IQ test on iq-test.cc. When you finish, select age 30 and send me the link to your result." Agent IQ Time Limit spent Claude Cowork Opus 4.8 90 85m ~10 pts Claude Code Opus 4.8 90 96m ~28 pts Claude Sonnet 4.6 68 62m n/a Codex 5.5 $100 Fast 124 18m ~12 pts Codex 5.4 $100 Fast 101 16m ~14 pts Codex 5.5 $200 Fast 131 34m ~6 pts The score is only part of the story. Codex 5.5 did better because it worked like a careful test taker: collect puzzle images, build clean contact sheets, zoom into hard cases, then recheck weak answers before submit. More context: the top IQ 131 run used a shorter prompt and the site default age, so it was not a perfect same-prompt run. Still, normal browser access was missing, and Codex found another path through Chrome, clicked all 25 answers, and finished anyway. Claude was careful, especially Opus. It wrote notes and reasoned step by step. Codex was more organized and faster. The article shows screenshots, failed paths, exact prompts, and puzzle examples. The most useful lesson: for visual web tasks, method can beat size. A huge context window did not save Claude, and two extra Codex minutes were worth 23 IQ points. read details on our website Please support this young channel by subscribing. Your subscription really helps us grow. There are no ads here.

Open in Telegram
Views94,658+483%vs avg
Forwards8
Reactions78
Comments—
#406Text

GigaChat 3.5 Ultra Publicly Released — The New Generation of the Flagship Model The GigaChat team has released GigaChat 3.5 Ultra as open source—a new 432B model under the MIT license. This is the first open-source hybrid of GatedDeltaNet and MLA scaled to hundreds of billions of parameters, featuring a proprietary training recipe we refined through more than 1,500 experiments. The model has grown in terms of code, mathematics, agent scenarios, and application domains—yet it’s 40% smaller than GigaChat 3.1 Ultra. What’s inside: 🔘A proprietary hybrid MLA + Gated DeltaNet architecture with a dedicated stabilization framework, without which this hybrid setup would not train reliably at this scale; 🔘 Gated Attention: the model can locally down-weight overly strong signals from the attention layer; 🔘GatedNorm: normalization with an explicit gate that controls signal magnitude across features; 🔘Approximately 4x lower KV cache per token: with the same memory budget, the model can support 2.14x longer context and deliver a 20% throughput increase under load; 🔘Two MTP heads, enabling up to 2.2x faster generation; 🔘FP8 across all training stages with no quality degradation compared with bf16, enabled by custom Triton and CUDA kernels; 🔘A new online RL stage after SFT and DPO. Results: 🔘 GigaChat-3.5-Ultra-Base outperforms DeepSeek V3.2 Exp Base and DeepSeek V4 Flash Base on average across a set of general, math, and code benchmarks: 🔘 GigaChat-3.5-Ultra-Instruct is comparable to DeepSeek V3.2 in terms of average score, despite having half the size; 🔘 According to the MiniMax-M2.7 LLM judge, the average win rate against GigaChat 3.1 Ultra is 75.9%, and against GPT-5 is 68.7%. The entire stack — data (our own LLM-filtered Common Crawl, 600+ programming languages in the code), architecture, training methodology, and infrastructure — was built end-to-end by GigaChat team. ➡️ HuggingFace

Open in Telegram
Views75,483+365%vs avg
Forwards5
Reactions37
Comments—

All posts

Connections